 |
|
To view presentations available on CTN's website, please click one of the following links:
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
eHealthConnecticut Enterprise Portal > Public Comment Portal
|
|
|
Thank you for visiting the eHealthConnecticut Public Comment Portal
eHealthConnecticut's mission is to improve the quality, safety, and efficiency of healthcare for Connecticut residents by creating, championing, and sustaining a secure statewide Health Information Exchange (HIE). In order to achieve its mission, eHealthConnecticut supports an open process to allow input from multiple stakeholders, including residents of the state, on its approaches and policies currently being developed.
Below you will see several documents currently available for public review and comment. You have several options available to you:
- Review documents: Click any of the files under "Public Documents" to open and review those files.
- Post comments to the blog: Send an email to 'ehealthctpublic@p0.exmx.net' with the title for your post in the subject line.
- Send a non-public comment: Send an email to 'ehealthctpublic@p0.exmx.net' with the "Do not post for public viewing" in the subject line.
- Sign up to receive future announcements: Click here to sign up for eHealthConnecticut's listserv to get future eHealthConnecticut announcements.
Thank you for visiting eHealthConnecticut's Public Comment Portal. If you would like more information please visit ehealthConnecticut's website by clicking here. We look forward to hearing your comments, and jointly improving the healthcare system in Connecticut.
|
|
|
|
We want your comments! 
To post your comments to the blog below, simply send an email to 'ehealthctpublic@p0.exmx.net' from your personal or business email account. Our public comment policy mandates that a person's name be included in the post. However, please ensure that you remove any phone numbers from your email prior to sending. eHealthConnecticut reserves the right to approve postings to this portal, but will approve all constructive comments. The subject line of your email will become the title of your post. The contents of the email will become the contents of the post.
If you would like to send comments to eHealthConnecticut on publicly available documents, but do not wish that they be posted to this portal for public viewing, please send an email to 'ehealthctpublic@p0.exmx.net' but type "Do not post for public viewing" into the subject line. Your comments will be considered for inclusion in future drafts of the documents, but will not be posted to this portal.
Thank you again for reviewing and contributing to the future policies governing the exchange of health information in Connecticut.
View Comments from Others Below |
|
8/7/2009
Why does the HIE need a separate Opt-In or Opt-Out consent
form? Most providers’ Notice of Privacy Practices already includes
language to notify patients that their healthcare practitioner/provider may
share their PHI with other internal and external providers and entities to
support treatment, payment or operations. An HIE simply provides a means
of sharing data - in addition to other available methods like fax, email,
phone, meetings, paper documents, etc. Thus, the HIE doesn’t
inherently do more than electronically connect various covered entities and
business associates for TPO support – much like the phone company does
when you use the phone or fax to share data, or an ISP vendor does when you
send email with patient data or log onto an Internet portal, Skype or third
party software system.
In addition, of course, an HIE may also host and/or manage a
central store of patient data via a data base management system and/or software
messaging system like Axolotl, Emdeon, GE or other HIE support product. On
top of that, HIE staff and administrators may support or even be directly
involved in quality improvement, data collection, research, reporting, auditing,
collective bargaining/contracting, etc. with, or for, one or more of its member
organizations, which requires access to patient data. This, again, is a
support function similar to those being provided today by administrators of an
Independent Physicians Association (IPA) for quality improvement/operations
purposes.
Therefore, would it be legally viable (and simpler) to
provide covered entity HIE members with one or two sentences to include in
their existing Notice of Privacy Practices referring to sharing PHI with other
external providers and covered entities for the purposes of treatment, payment
and operations via an electronic Health Information Exchange and/or Regional
Health Information Organization – and continue to allow patients to
opt-out of sharing data with outside entities as they do now? The HIE would
then serve as a Business Associate to its member covered entities and support
organizations and include BAA language in their HIE Agreement/contract with its
members – and/or in a separate document.
Jim Albert
CIO Associates
8/5/2009
The following statement raises a major
concern:
“I understand that Health Insurers will
have access to my Medical Records for Disease Management, Case Management and
Quality Improvement purposes. Health Insurers will not use this information for
claim or coverage determination.”
I
don’t think the opt in for treatment purposes should include a general
permission for any insurance company to access my records. I think it is
more appropriate to limit the access to MY insurance company(ies). If
anyone else wants access, I want to be able to grant a separate authorization.
If there is some rationalization for letting any insurance company have access,
then it must be explained clearly and convincingly. Otherwise, I suggest
this language be constrained to include only health plans of which I am a
beneficiary.
William R. "Bill" Braithwaite, MD, PhD, FACMI
Chief Medical Officer
Anakam Inc.
12 - 3rd Street NE
Washington, DC 20002
(202)669-9444 mobile
8/4/2009
· I agree with Rich Kubica, this is in fact an opt-out policy, in which patients can opt-out fully, or partially (records still available for emergency uses).
· Policies: Paragraph 3 conflicts with paragraph 1.
· UMRRA: This needs a preamble that identifies and explains what eHCT is, and its relation(s) to the Provider. This should also be set up as one document covering opt-in, opt-out-partial, and opt-out-full. This will be much easier to administer and much less confusing for the patient. The document should be re-organized to explain the three options, then give the details.
Mark C. Borton
Founder and COO
Equity Health Partners, LLC 7/23/2009
In reviewing the presentation and the UMRR, I would not categorize the process of signing up for the HIE as an "Opt-In" model. I would call it a modified "Opt-Out" model. Clearly, if one signs the UMRR they are fully Opt-In with all records available. However, if one does nothing, the ability to see the individual's HIE record is still available in an emergency situation. This to me is "you have been Opted-In".
In my estimation, the current proposal will have most people "do nothing". This will allow their records to be seen in an emergency, and that will be OK since most people will be concerned about their privacy. However, for a group of people even this level of "Opt-In" will be unacceptable and they will contend that this was not full explained.
My recommendation, be descriptive. Tell them first that their records are available to healthcare givers in an Emergency. To change this you must explicitly "Opt-Out" to keep your records from being shared. You must also explicitly "Opt-In FULL" to have your information available to other HIE Participants and then describe the benefits.
This may be just a point of emphasis, but I believe it will better define the process to the patient.
Rich Kubica
7/18/2009
When posting a message to this dicussion, this is a sample of how the message will appear.
Kevin Carr, MD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|